Logic Models and Theories of Change – USAID/RFS Good Practice MEL Notes

Country

Global

Region

Global

Type

Guidance Note

Year

2023

Logic Models and Theories of Change – USAID/RFS Good Practice MEL Notes

Country

Global

Region

Global

Type

Technical Guidance Document

Year

2023

Abstract:

Logic models serve as a potent visual representation of a Theory of Change (ToC), encompassing various forms such as Results Frameworks, results chains, and Logical Frameworks. While not a stringent requirement by USAID at the activity level, the integration of a ToC and logic model in an Activity Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (AMELP) is fervently recommended. This guidance note, part of the RFS Good Practice MEL Notes series, elucidates the alignment of these models with the stated objectives of an activity, set within a particular context. It accentuates the coherence between components of the Activity MEL Plan and the ToC, fostering a comprehensive understanding of development paradigms.

Description:

RFS Good Practice MEL Notes aim to highlight examples of strong Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) practices across the central portfolio of activities managed by USAID’s Bureau of Resilience and Food Security (RFS). These notes complement USAID’s agency-wide MEL guidance with concrete examples of how RFS is integrating MEL elements into its investments. The primary audiences for these notes are RFS Implementing Partners (IPs), A/CORs, and RFS MEL Specialists. While IPs typically develop Activity MEL Plans, RFS hopes these notes will encourage enhanced A/COR and RFS MEL Specialist engagement and collaboration throughout the Program Cycle.

Related publications

Gender Pay Gap in the United States

The infographic titled “Gender Pay Gap in the United States, September 18, 2023” by Andrea Pozderac and Azra K. Nurkic, sheds light on the persistent gender wage disparity in the U.S. In 2023, women earned 84.5 cents for every dollar earned by men, indicating a 15.5 cent gap. The infographic explores various factors contributing to this gap, such as occupational segregation, work experience, and educational attainment. It also highlights state-wise disparities, with Connecticut showing the smallest gap and Utah the largest. Additionally, it underscores the overrepresentation of women in lower-paying jobs and the challenges faced by women of color.

Subscribe

Enter your mail below to receive updates from Institute for Development Impact