A Heuristic Tool for Building a Balanced D-MERL System in a Post Response Recovery

Country

Sierra Leone, Guinea, Liberia

Region

West Africa

Type

Technical Guidance Document

Year

2019

A Heuristic Tool for Building a Balanced D-MERL System in a Post Response Recovery

Country

Sierra Leone, Guinea, Liberia

Region

West Africa

Type

Technical Guidance Document

Year

2019

Abstract:

The purpose of this document is to help USAID staff plan for and implement effective and efficient programs and monitoring, evaluation, research, and learning (MERL) systems in a post response recovery. This heuristic tool is a quick reference document developed to assist program managers and MERL practitioners navigate the process of building the balanced design-monitoring, evaluation, research, and learning (D-MERL) system in this evolving context.
Six building blocks of a D-MERL system are presented below and associated questions that help to frame
Blocks are detailed in the publication

Building block 1: Partners and collaboration
Building block 2. Program strategy – the big picture planning
Building Block 3. Results frameworks and MERL plans
Building Block 4. Reporting system
Building Block 5. Data-based target setting
Building Block 6. Performance monitoring, evaluation and learning

Description:

Given the emergent nature of programming in a post response recovery transition period, D-MERL plays a vital role in evolving program strategy and enabling collaboration, learning and adapting. In such contexts, D-MERL systems should be flexible to accommodate the program’s needs for urgent action and allow for iterations of major D-MERL products to take place over time as conditions change. For example, aspects of the D-MERL system may need to change or be iterated, after review of initial program results or once new partners or program components are added on. However, D-MERL “stakes in the sand” need to mark each stage, so that implementation and other D-MERL activities can proceed without delays in planned and coordinated ways and not ad-hoc.

Related publications

Development Disrupted: Reassessing the Implications of USAID’s Restructuring Amid Global Aid Realignment

This infographic analyzes the consequences of USAID’s 2023–2024 restructuring, which led to the termination of 5,341 projects and the defunding of 2,353 implementing partners, many of whom lost 100% of their USAID support. Over 55% of recipient countries lost all funding. The analysis extends beyond the U.S. to consider concurrent budget contractions by other donor countries, indicating a systemic shift in how foreign aid is prioritized and delivered. The infographic visualizes these changes, offering insights into the scale, distribution, and potential implications of a more constrained and transactional development aid environment.

The Future of U.S. Foreign Assistance: Unlocking U.S. Business Investment

This article examines the Trump administration’s proposed restructuring of U.S. foreign assistance, which seeks to streamline agencies and align aid with investment-driven growth. The plan introduces promising steps to improve efficiency and expand opportunities for U.S. businesses abroad. However, the transition also brings important considerations, such as ensuring continued access to technical expertise, maintaining regional flexibility, and supporting financing tools that encourage investment in higher-risk markets. The piece outlines ways to maximize the benefits of these reforms while addressing potential challenges to ensure the new structure drives sustainable growth and impact.

Subscribe

Enter your mail below to receive updates from Institute for Development Impact

Wishing you a peaceful holiday season
and a prosperous New Year 2026.