A total of 2,000 household surveys were completed with 2239 women.
At each home, the field team surveyed women 18 years or older, further specifying and identifying women who are either the primary caregiver for a child 0-5 in the household and/or the main food preparer for the household.
A total of 1,000 household surveys were completed with 1138 women.
At each home, the field team surveyed women 18 years or older, further specifying and identifying women who are either the primary caregiver for a child 0-5 in the household and/or the main food preparer for the household.
A total of 1,000 household surveys were completed with 1,101 women.
At each home, the field team surveyed women 18 years or older, further specifying and identifying women who are either the primary caregiver for a child 0-5 in the household and/or the main food preparer for the household.
Respondents were further queried on their access to their main water source, throughout the year and if partial year access, by season.
Respondents were further queried on their access to their main water source, throughout the year and if partial year access, by season.
Respondents were further queried on their access to their main water source, throughout the year and if partial year access, by season.
There is a relationship between water shortage and latrine use. In the summer, some villagers in both districts expressed a scarcity of water, which made them unable to use their latrines. In these cases, they had to go outside.
There is a relationship between seasonality and water quality, particularly in Yavatmal. Several women from two different villages said they sometimes drink dirty water from the borewell in the summer. Others noted that after the rain, the borewell water can become turbid which increases the chance of diseases spreading.
The responsibility for collection of water for the household falls disproportionately on women. The time it takes to collect water also represents a greater opportunity cost associated with potential loss of wages for adult members of the household.
On average for households who travel off their household premises to collect water, it takes 96 minutes per day.
24minutes per trip
4trips per day
Respondents were asked to indicate their level of concern about various aspects of household water and sanitation.
Wages lost were calculated by applying average wage by gender to time lost due to water collection by adult women and men.
₹744 females
The responsibility for collection of water for the household falls disproportionately on women. The time it takes to collect water also represents a greater opportunity cost associated with potential loss of wages for adult members of the household.
On average for households who travel off their household premises to collect water, it takes 96 minutes per day.
24minutes per trip
4trips per day
Respondents were asked to indicate their level of concern about various aspects of household water and sanitation.
Wages lost were calculated by applying average wage by gender to time lost due to water collection by adult women and men.
₹744 females
The responsibility for collection of water for the household falls disproportionately on women. The time it takes to collect water also represents a greater opportunity cost associated with potential loss of wages for adult members of the household.
On average for households who travel off their household premises to collect water, it takes 96 minutes per day.
24minutes per trip
4trips per day
Respondents were asked to indicate their level of concern about various aspects of household water and sanitation.
Wages lost were calculated by applying average wage by gender to time lost due to water collection by adult women and men.
₹744 females
State | Value |
---|---|
Madhya Pradesh | 80.9% |
Maharashtra | 92.1% |
of non-adopters expressed intent to take a loan to finance this improvement
State | Value |
---|---|
Dewas | 76.9% |
Dhar | 81.2% |
Indore | 87.9% |
Khandwa | 84.0% |
Sehore | 75.9% |
For nearly every source of water, approximately 92% of respondents reported household satisfaction, which was confirmed in focus group discussions. Exception: Only 83.8% of 99 respondents reported satisfaction with their household's tubewell/borehole with a handpump. Prolonged scarcity and turbid water were mentioned as possible reasons for dissatisfaction with water access.
Qualitative data underscored the high satisfaction with water access.
Few FGD participants cited reasons for dissatisfaction
In Wardha, prolonged scarcity and turbid water were mentioned as possible reasons for dissatisfaction
In both districts, FGD participants indicated that seasonal scarcity was not much of an issue
No financial means
No interest in investing in WASH given general water scarcity
Village water facility improvement is seen as a responsibility of the government, requiring the involvement of the Gram Panchayat
Local government programs to finance latrines/water services for villagers renders individual investment unnecessary
Saving groups are a key way to access loans for WASH and other household necessities. Most women were satisfied with their saving groups, citing ease of access and lower interest rates as positive sides and small loan amounts as negative.
Gram Panchyat (the local governing body) works to improve the village WASH situation, providing bleaching powder, water filters, pipe fittings, toilet or water facilities, etc
Bank loans require excessive documentation, lengthy procedures, multiple trips to the bank, land or property ownership, credit history and/or include tight repayment plans.
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Handwashing details
women in Maharashtra do not practice correct handwashing
Areas for improvement
of all women do not rub both hands together when washing
of all women do not dry hands hygienically after washing
of all women do not wash their hands before eating
Vignette on food preparers and child care givers
women who are main caregiver for a child (0-5) and/or the main preparer of food for a household do not practice proper handwashing technique
women who are both food preparer and primary child caregiver does not wash their hands after cleaning baby's bottom or disposing of child faces
Women's empowerment was explored through a set of questions querying respondents on their general self-efficacy and female agency in WASH decision-making in the household. Self-efficacy scores were generated through analysis of responses to a set of 10 standardized questions designed to estimate a female level of agency, ability to navigate challenges, and confidence. For agency in WASH decision-making, women were asked about a number of household WASH scenarios and asked if women, men, or a mix of the two were included in the process.
The possible range of self-efficacy scores for each woman is 0-30. The higher the score, the higher the woman's self-efficacy, with the highest possible score being 30.
Responses were scored to rate households on female input on WASH decisions by establishing their input on all the decisions, a mix, or none of the decisions. The possible range of agency in WASH decision making is 0-100%.
No statistical relationship between self-efficacy and women's agency
Qualitative findings show that men and women generally agree that it is appropriate for women to inform decisions about household finances and spending. However, many emphasized that the decisions should ultimately be made together, or with final approval from the man.
Both women and men lacked basic knowledge of the meaning or the concept of women's empowerment.
Nearly all respondents looked favorably upon the idea of women's empowerment and noted that the situation of women has progressed in recent years, although some men and women acknowledged that women were not fully "empowered" yet.
Many women noted that saving groups aided in female collective action, individual confidence, and decision-making. Saving groups have led, for example, to sanitation campaigns, liquor bans, and local business development in many of the villages.
Women's empowerment was explored through a set of questions querying respondents on their general self-efficacy and female agency in WASH decision-making in the household. Self-efficacy scores were generated through analysis of responses to a set of 10 standardized questions designed to estimate a female level of agency, ability to navigate challenges, and confidence. For agency in WASH decision-making, women were asked about a number of household WASH scenarios and asked if women, men, or a mix of the two were included in the process.
The possible range of self-efficacy scores for each woman is 0-30. The higher the score, the higher the woman's self-efficacy, with the highest possible score being 30.
Responses were scored to rate households on female input on WASH decisions by establishing their input on all the decisions, a mix, or none of the decisions. The possible range of agency in WASH decision making is 0-100%.
Analysis for this study revealed that women's self-efficacy is not correlated with greater agency in WASH-decision making. Higher self-efficacy scores do not result in more involvement in household WASH decisions. For additional information on methodology, analysis, and documentation, please view the baseline report accessible through the button labeled "Download the Report" on the upper right corner of this browser.
Women's empowerment was explored through a set of questions querying respondents on their general self-efficacy and female agency in WASH decision-making in the household. Self-efficacy scores were generated through analysis of responses to a set of 10 standardized questions designed to estimate a female level of agency, ability to navigate challenges, and confidence. For agency in WASH decision-making, women were asked about a number of household WASH scenarios and asked if women, men, or a mix of the two were included in the process.
The possible range of self-efficacy scores for each woman is 0-30. The higher the score, the higher the woman's self-efficacy, with the highest possible score being 30.
Responses were scored to rate households on female input on WASH decisions by establishing their input on all the decisions, a mix, or none of the decisions. The possible range of agency in WASH decision making is 0-100%.
Analysis for this study revealed that women's self-efficacy is not correlated with greater agency in WASH-decision making. Higher self-efficacy scores do not result in more involvement in household WASH decisions. For additional information on methodology, analysis, and documentation, please view the baseline report accessible through the button labeled "Download the Report" on the upper right corner of this browser.
No correlation between self-efficacy score and:
In 83.4% of households, women are involved in a mix or all household WASH decisions.
State | Value |
---|---|
Madhya Pradesh | 71% |
Maharashtra | 75.2% |
State | Value |
---|---|
Dewas | 70.8% |
Dhar | 66% |
Indore | 79.3% |
Khandwa | 70.4% |
Sehore | 74.1% |
FGD respondents mentioned that the desire and understanding for improved sanitation facilities is there, but barriers include:
State | Value |
---|---|
Wardha | 82.6% |
Yavatmal | 70.5% |
There is a higher demand for sanitation improvements and greater appetite for investing in those improvements across the board in W+W program areas. However, a lack of household capital is the largest barrier to both water and sanitation improvements followed by those waiting for government subsidies (particularly on sanitation). On their own, the availability of WASH loans and financing seems unlikely to change demand for investment given these underlying barriers. Are there alternative models of WASH financing or local engagement mechanisms that would appeal to households in W+W implementation areas?
The most effective drivers for motivating households to invest in WASH improvements are likely to be related to productivity and efficient use of resources (including time) and not worries or concerns about disease or health. While many programs seeks to reduce household concern over WASH management, increasing awareness of health risks associated with poor WASH practice may actually increase the concerns that households have related to those factors. It may also be useful to consider another indicators that monitor household awareness of both the risks of poor WASH access, adoption, and practice as well as the benefits of proper WASH.
A very high number of households practice incorrect water treatment practice or no treatment at all in W+W program areas. The use of proper filters would increase the number of households practicing correct practice (as many households are incorrectly using cloth). However, given low levels of household concern about the spread of disease through drinking water, this will likely also require awareness and education about the risks and benefits of proper water treatment.
While most women do have input into their household WASH decisions, when financial resources are concerned, they are often stopped short of making the ultimate decisions. Given that many women's empowerment programs will likely have a more direct effect on women's self-efficacy through training and less influence over the household as a whole, additional engagement of men or families as a unit in women's empowerment or gender sensitivity trainings may potentially prime the pump for greater impact of women's efficacy and female agency in WASH at the household level.